Photos

Before and after is a clinical record and the marketing.

The gap is never storage. It is that the permission to publish lives somewhere else from the image.

On the case, at a timepoint

Not in a patient folder.

Fixed angle sets per vertical, captured at timepoints tied to the procedure date. That is what makes a three, six and twelve month comparison possible eighteen months later without anybody hunting.

A RootLogic patient record with the consult, the quote, the invoice and the conversation on one page
A patient record with the case and the imagery pathway. Demonstration data.
A library you are not afraid to publish from

Consent travels with the image.

In a category sold on results, the most persuasive asset a practice owns is usually the one it cannot use, because nobody can prove which images the patient agreed could be shown.

  • Publishing consent as a state on the image, with scope and date
  • Filter to what is cleared, so a marketing request takes minutes
  • Withdrawal propagates rather than relying on a deletion nobody can verify
  • Nothing leaves the tenant automatically
Next

Open the product before you talk to anyone.

The demo tenant is a working RootLogic on demonstration data. Click the pipeline, open a case, read a quote, look at where the revenue came from. No form, no call.